Managed Operations

Completed work, at an agreed volume, within an agreed time

Work arrives, and it comes back finished inside the response time in your agreement, at the accuracy in your agreement, with anything that could not be completed flagged to a named person on your side. Every month you get volume, turnaround, accuracy and cost per unit against the baseline.

  • From $750/mo
  • Response times in writing
  • Monthly reporting
  • Systems we did not build

Recurring work without an owner is the most expensive work you have

It rarely shows up as a line in the budget, which is why it survives. Six patterns turn up in almost every function we take on.

The recurring work has no owner

Lead follow-up, quoting, member renewals, reconciliation, reporting. Each one is a second job for whoever picked it up, done after the first job is finished.

It gets done late, or in a rush, or not at all.

The backlog is invisible until it is a problem

Nobody counts what came in against what went out, so the gap only shows up when a client asks where their thing is.

You find out from the customer.

Quality moves with whoever is doing it

Two people handle the same task two ways because there is no agreed definition of what a finished one looks like.

Rework, and complaints that are hard to trace.

Hiring is the only lever you have

Volume goes up, so headcount goes up, and the fixed cost stays up when volume comes back down.

Capacity you cannot adjust in under three months.

The system was built and then left

Someone delivered an automation or a CRM configuration, handed over a document, and moved on. Nobody has looked at it since.

It drifts, quietly, until it is producing wrong answers.

Nothing is reported against a baseline

You know roughly what the function costs and roughly how fast it is, but not precisely enough to tell whether last quarter was better.

No basis for deciding what to fix next.

Six numbers, written into the agreement

Each one is set against your function before anything starts, and each one appears in the monthly report. A commitment nobody reports on is a preference.

Processing capacity
The volume we handle each month, stated as a number. Leads contacted, quotes produced, invoices reconciled, records updated, whatever the unit of work is for your function.
Response times
How long between work arriving and work coming back, per work type. On inbound lead contact that is four business hours. Slower and faster commitments exist for other work, and yours is fixed before we start.
Accuracy commitments
What a finished item has to look like to count as finished, and the rate we hold. Anything below it is our rework, not yours.
Operational coverage
Which hours, which days, and what happens to work that arrives outside them. Named cover for holidays and absence, so the function does not stop when one person does.
Exception handling
The items that cannot be completed to standard are flagged to a named person on your side with what is missing, rather than sitting in a queue.
Reporting cadence
A monthly report on volume, turnaround, accuracy, exception rate and cost per unit, each against the baseline taken before we took the function on.

Four bands. The work sets which one you are in

The band follows what the work touches, not how much you want to spend. Personal data moves you up one. Money or a regulated process moves you up again.

Standard operations

$750 to $2,000 a month

Low sensitivity work

Recurring work with a clear rule set and no personal or regulated data. Scheduling, data entry, standard document production, routine follow-up.

  • Defined monthly volume
  • Stated turnaround
  • Monthly report
  • Named escalation contact

Assisted operations

$2,000 to $6,000 a month

Personal or business data in scope

Work where the system reads and writes real client records. Lead handling, quoting, member management, CRM hygiene, reconciliation.

  • Everything in Standard
  • Access and data handling controls
  • Human review on defined steps
  • Quarterly governance review

Governed operations

$6,000 to $20,000+ a month

Agentic, regulated, or payments

A whole function, or work that touches money or a regulated process. Agents act inside the workflow with approval gates on the actions that need them.

  • Everything in Assisted
  • Approval gates and full audit trail
  • Incident response path
  • Roadmap refreshed each quarter

On a system we did not build

$2,000 to $20,000+ a month

Assessed first, then taken on

You already have the CRM, the automation or the workflow. We assess what is there, fix what stops it holding a commitment, and then run it to the same standard.

  • Assessment of the existing system
  • Remediation scoped before the commitment starts
  • Same reporting and service levels
  • No requirement to rebuild it with us

The fourth band exists because most of the work in a business is running on something somebody else set up. You do not have to rebuild a system with us to have us run it. If the assessment finds it cannot hold a commitment as it stands, we scope the fix separately and you decide whether it is worth doing.

Whether a service level is what you need

This fits if

  • The work repeats, arrives regularly, and somebody is currently squeezing it in
  • You can say what a finished item looks like, or you want help defining it
  • You would rather buy capacity you can adjust than headcount you cannot
  • You want the function measured monthly rather than reviewed annually
  • You have a system running that nobody has looked after since it went in

Start somewhere else if

  • The system does not exist yet and needs building. Go to FusionBuild for one workflow, or the AI Operating System for a whole function.
  • You do not yet know which function is costing you the most. Go to FusionMap.
  • What you want is your own team doing the work better. Go to AI Systems Mastery.
  • The function is marketing and demand generation. Growth Marketing is the same model, scoped to that work.

Asked before every agreement

Will you run something you did not build?

Yes, and it is a published band rather than an exception. We assess what is there first, tell you what has to change before anyone can commit to a service level on it, and scope that remediation separately. If the honest answer is that it cannot hold a commitment without a rebuild, we say so rather than signing and hoping.

What happens when you miss a commitment?

It appears in the monthly report with the reason, because a report that only shows the good months is not a report. Repeated misses on the same work type trigger a review of whether the commitment or the process is wrong. Rework below the accuracy standard is ours.

Is this the same as the AI Operating System?

No. The AI Operating System is a build: the environment, the agents and the controls get created. This is a service level on work that gets done. Many clients buy the build and then this, but you can buy either one alone, and this one works on systems we had nothing to do with.

Do we lose control of the function?

You keep the decisions and the exception calls. Access, approval rules and who may authorize what are set by you and reviewed quarterly. Everything the function does is logged, and the log is yours.

How long is the commitment?

Long enough for the baseline to mean something, which in practice is a quarter at minimum. Volume bands are adjusted at review rather than renegotiated every month.

Name the function that keeps slipping

Thirty minutes on a call is enough to size the volume, agree what a finished item looks like, and tell you which band the work lands in.